MaplePitch Logo

Bafana Bafana's World Cup Struggles Amidst Hate Speech

Ronwen Williams walked into the media room in Atlanta carrying more than a captain’s armband. He carried a country’s politics, a continent’s anger, and the kind of digital venom that has turned this World Cup into a minefield for Bafana Bafana.

On Thursday, South Africa face Czechia in a pivotal Group A clash at Atlanta Stadium. The date is symbolic: the International Day for Countering Hate Speech. For Williams and his teammates, it feels less like a commemoration and more like a live experiment.

A dream soured before kick-off

This was supposed to be a World Cup of renewal. The core of this Bafana squad grew up watching the class of 2010 on home soil, dreaming of one day stepping onto the global stage themselves. That dream has been twisted by forces far beyond a football pitch.

South Africa’s hardening anti-immigrant posture has not only stained the country’s image, it has followed Bafana into the tournament. A poor start on the field has done the rest.

The 2-0 defeat to Mexico at Azteca Stadium on 11 June did more than dent hopes of a smooth path out of Group A. It lit the fuse. According to FIFA’s social media protection service, Bafana players have been hit by unprecedented levels of online abuse since the tournament began. The volume of hate directed at players across this World Cup, they say, has already surpassed the entire tally from Qatar 2022 — and we are barely a week into the competition.

Bafana are right in the eye of that storm.

Targeted from home and abroad

Williams, usually one of the calmer figures in South African football, has found himself at the centre of it.

“We know how difficult it is now on social media, where everyone is attacking you,” he said. “Sometimes it’s (because of) false information. If you lose a game, and you don’t perform, you can take it as players. You can put your hand up. But when there’s false information that goes around, then it hurts.”

One fabricated quote, attributed to him and picked up by reputable outlets, claimed he had criticised Africans for supporting Mexico over Bafana, and said the team almost cried about it. It never happened.

“I have been a target over the last few days over things I didn’t say. I didn’t say anything about Africa, or people supporting Mexico. I have always said that as Africa, we are one. We support each other in good and bad moments.”

The abuse has come from two directions. From home, angry Bafana supporters furious with the team’s performance and with the country’s wider turmoil. From across the continent, where South Africa’s anti-immigrant stance has sparked fury and, in some cases, a grim new pastime: “hate watching” Bafana.

“I have been attacked... my country as well, for things that are going on back home,” Williams admitted.

Politics in the dressing room

The current mood did not appear in a vacuum. The vigilante group March and March has become a loud, unsettling presence in South Africa’s political landscape. Calling itself “a grassroots citizen movement addressing growing concerns about undocumented immigration in South Africa”, it has set a 30 June deadline for undocumented migrants to leave the country.

No clear plan for what happens after that date. The scenes from their marches, though, suggest intimidation at best, violence at worst.

Their rise has been so sharp that President Cyril Ramaphosa felt compelled to address the nation on border security. Governments across the continent have opened channels for voluntary repatriation. The message, inside Africa and beyond, is clear: South Africa is closing in.

The backlash has landed on the national team before. In 2019, Madagascar and Zambia refused to play friendlies against Bafana in the wake of xenophobic attacks in South Africa. Then-coach Molefi Ntseki, newly installed after Stuart Baxter, went into the 2021 Afcon qualifiers undercooked, short of vital preparation time. Bafana failed to qualify, finishing third behind Ghana and Sudan in a group that also contained São Tomé and Príncipe.

Six years on, the same tensions have resurfaced, this time in the middle of a World Cup.

“You want to focus on doing your job, which is being a footballer, but then you get involved in politics even though you don’t want to get into that space,” Williams said.

The human cost of a digital pile-on

There is a cold, brutal line in modern football: “Players must be able to handle criticism.” It is repeated often. It is also incomplete.

“Players are human beings as well. We go through it. Sometimes it gets a lot,” Williams said.

He and his teammates have not just watched the abuse scroll past. They have sat in meetings to discuss how to live with it, how to keep their focus when their phones are burning with insults and threats.

“As sad as this sounds, players have accepted it (the online abuse), that that’s how things are in the world now,” he said.

Inside the camp, the message from Hugo Broos has been sharp.

“You have an experienced coach in coach Hugo (Broos), who says that the most important thing is to analyse the game. That is the most important thing, to block out the noise, focus on how we can do better, learn from our mistakes and just stick together as a team.

“If you are going to listen to a million people’s opinions, then you will lose your mind. So, at this moment, the most important comment and the person to listen to is our coach and technical team. He knows us, and we know him. He knows our strengths and weaknesses.”

Football as escape — and battleground

The irony is stark. While politics drags Bafana into a fight they did not choose, football remains one of the few spaces where South Africans, and Africans, still find common ground.

“We are in Atlanta now, and I see so many Africans... so many South Africans and people from Mexico, in one room. That’s the beauty of sport. That’s the beauty of football,” Williams said.

“So, let’s just enjoy and have a wonderful time, and we leave politics to the politicians. Let us just play football, and enjoy ourselves.

“Criticise [us] for what happens on the field, but off the field things - we can’t deal with that, and it has nothing to do with us. As Africans, let’s unite and keep going because we are all in this together.”

It is a simple appeal, almost naïve against the backdrop of border disputes, vigilante deadlines and social media rage. Yet it is the only shield players have.

A group on the line

The stakes on Thursday are brutal in their clarity.

The World Cup format offers a narrow margin for error. The top two teams in each group go straight through to the last 32. Eight of the best third-placed sides from the 12 groups will join them. After losing to Mexico, Bafana cannot afford another misstep.

Williams knows it. So do his teammates. Their route out of Group A will depend not just on tactics and finishing, but on how well they can shut out the hatred that has followed them from home and from parts of the continent.

“We are there for one another. We came here together, and we will leave here together. So, let us stick together as a team and keep the focus,” the captain said.

On the International Day for Countering Hate Speech, South Africa’s players will walk out at Atlanta Stadium carrying more than a nation’s hopes of progression. They will carry the question that has stalked them all week:

Can a team play free, expressive football when the loudest voices around it would rather see it burn?