MaplePitch Logo

Evangelos Marinakis Sues Crystal Palace for Defamation

Evangelos Marinakis is suing Crystal Palace for defamation over a controversial banner displayed at Selhurst Park last season, escalating a flashpoint moment into a full-scale legal battle between a Premier League club and a rival owner.

The Nottingham Forest supremo has lodged a claim in the High Court after Palace supporters unveiled a flag depicting him holding a gun to the head of Forest midfielder Morgan Gibbs-White. The image appeared last August, shortly after Gibbs-White’s proposed move to Tottenham collapsed and the player instead signed a contract extension at the City Ground.

The banner did not stop at the graphic illustration. It also carried lurid, unsubstantiated references to the Greek billionaire’s business dealings, a combination Marinakis believes has caused serious and lasting damage to his reputation far beyond English football.

An FA investigation followed in November. Palace were charged over the incident and ultimately hit with a £50,000 fine. For the governing body, the matter was closed. For Marinakis, it was not.

Sky Sports News understands the Forest owner regards the punishment as nowhere near sufficient given what he sees as global harm to his name. Convinced that the episode crossed a legal line, he is now determined to pursue the south London club “to the full extent of the law”.

At the heart of his case lies a simple contention: Crystal Palace, he believes, failed to prevent the banner being displayed and did not act quickly enough to have it removed once it appeared. His legal team are now working to establish precisely how responsible the club can be held for the actions of their supporters that afternoon.

FA regulations state that clubs must ensure their fans do not behave in a way that is “improper, offensive, abusive, insulting and/or provocative”. The Selhurst Park flag, in the eyes of the authorities, breached that threshold. The FA’s sanction has now been followed by a far more serious test in the civil courts.

Defamation law offers three main avenues for a claim: the publication of allegedly false statements, the creation of an image, or allowing such an image to be displayed. Marinakis’ action is understood to rest firmly in that territory, arguing that the depiction and its circulation in a packed Premier League stadium crossed from terrace provocation into reputational attack.

Crystal Palace have been contacted for comment. Nottingham Forest, approached over the legal move by their owner, declined to discuss an ongoing case.

The fallout from one banner now stretches well beyond a single afternoon at Selhurst Park and into a legal arena that could shape how far clubs must go to police what their fans choose to unfurl.